<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gold&#8217;s Next Move &#8211; Correction or $1,000?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goldstockbull.com/articles/golds-next-move-correction-or-1000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goldstockbull.com/articles/golds-next-move-correction-or-1000/</link>
	<description>Gold, Silver and Energy Investment Strategies.  Analysis of gold stocks, silver stocks and alternative energy stocks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 21:54:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monty</title>
		<link>http://www.goldstockbull.com/articles/golds-next-move-correction-or-1000/comment-page-1/#comment-56341</link>
		<dc:creator>Monty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 07:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldstockbull.com/golds-next-move-correction-or-1000/#comment-56341</guid>
		<description>Gold is an element, it can not be created from lead - it is physically impossible to convert elements!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gold is an element, it can not be created from lead &#8211; it is physically impossible to convert elements!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gold Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.goldstockbull.com/articles/golds-next-move-correction-or-1000/comment-page-1/#comment-53300</link>
		<dc:creator>Gold Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 03:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldstockbull.com/golds-next-move-correction-or-1000/#comment-53300</guid>
		<description>Have you ever heard that Russian alchemists have found a way to manufacture gold from lead at a cost of 400-600$ an ounce? They have never done it before because the manufacturing cost was too high. However, at today’s gold prices they are making a killing! What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever heard that Russian alchemists have found a way to manufacture gold from lead at a cost of 400-600$ an ounce? They have never done it before because the manufacturing cost was too high. However, at today’s gold prices they are making a killing! What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Cerulean</title>
		<link>http://www.goldstockbull.com/articles/golds-next-move-correction-or-1000/comment-page-1/#comment-53098</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cerulean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 18:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldstockbull.com/golds-next-move-correction-or-1000/#comment-53098</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with your thoughts on gold perhaps only enduring a brief 5% correction on its way to $1,000.

$100 Oil and $1000 Gold will soon be joined at the hip.

There are two reasons I believe gold still has much further to move.

Reason one, is that there is a surpising degree of pessimism among gold bulls.

All this week on the CNBC &amp; FOX business channels, gold bulls were talking about the &quot;one sided&quot; trade in the dollar, and how Oil may be in a bubble - both ready to correct,
and both being factors that would bring down gold.

The mood among gold bulls on the internet message boards and on some blogs is also a bit restrained.

While a dollar rally and a collapse in oil would certainly bring down gold - I don&#039;t think it&#039;s going to happen.

Everyone is focusing on this rally in gold and gold stocks as being driven by the Fed rate cuts and a weaker US Dollar.

And it was.

But, it was not the only reason gold is moving. And in my opinion - it is not even the &quot;main&quot; reason gold (and Oil) have been rallying to new highs. 

Oil broke out much earlier than did gold and the PM&#039;s. Many will say the move in oil was a geopolitical risk trade on Turkey, or even the US moving into Iran, but I think the move in Oil was more of a currency trade than a geopolitical one.

Oil trades much more freely than does gold.

There are no central banks dumping massive amounts of oil upon the market to cap it&#039;s price, or to silence it&#039;s voice on inflation.

The second reason, and the main reason that I believe gold is going higher - much higher, is the unfolding crisis in the US Financial system that gained momentum this week with Citibank falling 20% and Merrill Lynch&#039;s CEO being forced to resign as a $5 Billion Dollar subprime derivative loss turned into nearly $10 Billion.

Because the financials and the DOW have rallied so far off the August lows - people have begun to believe the BS that the Fed, the Treasury and the Investment Banks are shoveling us. 

But, this week - more cracks appeared.

First it was the subprime lenders. Then Countrywide, then Bear Stearns. 

Now it&#039;s Citibank and Merrill.

But, the largest shoe to drop may be Wall Streets &quot;golden child&quot; itself - Goldman Sachs.

Reports are now surfacing that a new accounting standard called &quot;SFAS 157&quot; which forces banks to classify off the books assets into 3 catagories will show that Goldman has perhaps as much as $72 Billion in what is called &quot;level III&quot; assets. 

Assets that they still hold at &quot;mark to model&quot; vs. mark to market valuations on their books.

And the reason this new accounting rule is so important, is because if those numbers are correct - Goldman holds $72 Billion of &quot;Enron-esque&quot; assets - and that is TWICE their capital base of $36 Billion.

I wrote a post about it here:

http://goldsilverstockcharts.wordpress.com/category/michael-ceruleans-gold-silver-commentary/

The next driver for gold may be this headline:

&quot;Are Citibank, Goldman Sachs &amp; Merrill Lynch - all bankrupt?&quot;

SFAS 157 may take the market where it&#039;s never been before.

Or, has it?

Can you say?
Enron, WorldCom, Global Crossing...

Michael Cerulean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with your thoughts on gold perhaps only enduring a brief 5% correction on its way to $1,000.</p>
<p>$100 Oil and $1000 Gold will soon be joined at the hip.</p>
<p>There are two reasons I believe gold still has much further to move.</p>
<p>Reason one, is that there is a surpising degree of pessimism among gold bulls.</p>
<p>All this week on the CNBC &amp; FOX business channels, gold bulls were talking about the &#8220;one sided&#8221; trade in the dollar, and how Oil may be in a bubble &#8211; both ready to correct,<br />
and both being factors that would bring down gold.</p>
<p>The mood among gold bulls on the internet message boards and on some blogs is also a bit restrained.</p>
<p>While a dollar rally and a collapse in oil would certainly bring down gold &#8211; I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to happen.</p>
<p>Everyone is focusing on this rally in gold and gold stocks as being driven by the Fed rate cuts and a weaker US Dollar.</p>
<p>And it was.</p>
<p>But, it was not the only reason gold is moving. And in my opinion &#8211; it is not even the &#8220;main&#8221; reason gold (and Oil) have been rallying to new highs. </p>
<p>Oil broke out much earlier than did gold and the PM&#8217;s. Many will say the move in oil was a geopolitical risk trade on Turkey, or even the US moving into Iran, but I think the move in Oil was more of a currency trade than a geopolitical one.</p>
<p>Oil trades much more freely than does gold.</p>
<p>There are no central banks dumping massive amounts of oil upon the market to cap it&#8217;s price, or to silence it&#8217;s voice on inflation.</p>
<p>The second reason, and the main reason that I believe gold is going higher &#8211; much higher, is the unfolding crisis in the US Financial system that gained momentum this week with Citibank falling 20% and Merrill Lynch&#8217;s CEO being forced to resign as a $5 Billion Dollar subprime derivative loss turned into nearly $10 Billion.</p>
<p>Because the financials and the DOW have rallied so far off the August lows &#8211; people have begun to believe the BS that the Fed, the Treasury and the Investment Banks are shoveling us. </p>
<p>But, this week &#8211; more cracks appeared.</p>
<p>First it was the subprime lenders. Then Countrywide, then Bear Stearns. </p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s Citibank and Merrill.</p>
<p>But, the largest shoe to drop may be Wall Streets &#8220;golden child&#8221; itself &#8211; Goldman Sachs.</p>
<p>Reports are now surfacing that a new accounting standard called &#8220;SFAS 157&#8243; which forces banks to classify off the books assets into 3 catagories will show that Goldman has perhaps as much as $72 Billion in what is called &#8220;level III&#8221; assets. </p>
<p>Assets that they still hold at &#8220;mark to model&#8221; vs. mark to market valuations on their books.</p>
<p>And the reason this new accounting rule is so important, is because if those numbers are correct &#8211; Goldman holds $72 Billion of &#8220;Enron-esque&#8221; assets &#8211; and that is TWICE their capital base of $36 Billion.</p>
<p>I wrote a post about it here:</p>
<p><a href="http://goldsilverstockcharts.wordpress.com/category/michael-ceruleans-gold-silver-commentary/" rel="nofollow">http://goldsilverstockcharts.wordpress.com/category/michael-ceruleans-gold-silver-commentary/</a></p>
<p>The next driver for gold may be this headline:</p>
<p>&#8220;Are Citibank, Goldman Sachs &amp; Merrill Lynch &#8211; all bankrupt?&#8221;</p>
<p>SFAS 157 may take the market where it&#8217;s never been before.</p>
<p>Or, has it?</p>
<p>Can you say?<br />
Enron, WorldCom, Global Crossing&#8230;</p>
<p>Michael Cerulean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->